↓ Skip to main content

Reading aids for adults with low vision

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reading aids for adults with low vision
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003303.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianni Virgili, Ruthy Acosta, Lori L Grover, Sharon A Bentley, Giovanni Giacomelli

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 31 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 40%
Unspecified 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Other 25 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,639,792
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,191
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,291
of 272,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.