↓ Skip to main content

Use of high-density tiling microarrays to identify mutations globally and elucidate mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of high-density tiling microarrays to identify mutations globally and elucidate mechanisms of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-r21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neekesh V Dharia, Amar Bir Singh Sidhu, María Belén Cassera, Scott J Westenberger, Selina ER Bopp, Rich T Eastman, David Plouffe, Serge Batalov, Daniel J Park, Sarah K Volkman, Dyann F Wirth, Yingyao Zhou, David A Fidock, Elizabeth A Winzeler

Abstract

The identification of genetic changes that confer drug resistance or other phenotypic changes in pathogens can help optimize treatment strategies, support the development of new therapeutic agents, and provide information about the likely function of genes. Elucidating mechanisms of phenotypic drug resistance can also assist in identifying the mode of action of uncharacterized but potent antimalarial compounds identified in high-throughput chemical screening campaigns against Plasmodium falciparum.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Chemistry 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,489
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,955
of 189,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.