↓ Skip to main content

Aspectos entomológicos e epidemiológicos das epidemias de dengue em Fortaleza, Ceará, 2001-2012*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 252)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspectos entomológicos e epidemiológicos das epidemias de dengue em Fortaleza, Ceará, 2001-2012*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000100014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rhaquel de Morais Alves Barbosa Oliveira, Fernanda Montenegro de Carvalho Araújo, Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti

Abstract

to characterize the entomological and epidemiological aspects of dengue epidemics occurred in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, from 2001 to 2012. descriptive study with data from the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan), Information System of Hospitalizations due to Yellow Fever and Dengue (2001-2009), National Program for Dengue Control (2010-2012), and Rapid Survey of Aedes aegypti Infestation Index, referring to the years in which the incidence of dengue was above 75%. from 2001 to 2012, 194,446 cases of suspected dengue were notified; the epidemic years were 2001, 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2012; there was a progressive increase in the incidence of the disease (587.0/100 thousand inhabitants in 2001 and 1,561.1/100 inhabitants in 2012); there was co-circulation of up to three serotypes and high vector infestation, especially in water tanks. after a long period of virus circulation in Fortaleza, dengue remains as an important health issue, with severe cases and high fatality rate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,921,427
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#29
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,310
of 276,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.