You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodology for enabling high-throughput simultaneous saccharification and fermentation screening of yeast using solid biomass as a substrate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13068-014-0181-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Elliston, Ian P Wood, Marie J Soucouri, Rachelle J Tantale, Jo Dicks, Ian N Roberts, Keith W Waldron |
| Abstract |
High-throughput (HTP) screening is becoming an increasingly useful tool for collating biological data which would otherwise require the employment of excessive resources. Second generation biofuel production is one such process. HTP screening allows the investigation of large sample sets to be undertaken with increased speed and cost effectiveness. This paper outlines a methodology that will enable solid lignocellulosic substrates to be hydrolyzed and fermented at a 96-well plate scale, facilitating HTP screening of ethanol production, whilst maintaining repeatability similar to that achieved at a larger scale. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,842,836
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#57
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,031
of 359,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.