↓ Skip to main content

Melatonin reduces migratory restlessness in Sylvia warblers during autumnal migration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melatonin reduces migratory restlessness in Sylvia warblers during autumnal migration
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonida Fusani, Francesca Coccon, Alfonso Rojas Mora, Wolfgang Goymann

Abstract

A remarkable aspect of bird migration is its nocturnality, particularly common in Passeriformes. The switch in activity from purely diurnal to also nocturnal is evident even in caged birds that during migratory periods develop an intense nocturnal restlessness, termed Zugunruhe. The mechanisms that control this major change in activity are mostly unknown. Previous work with Sylvia warblers suggested an involvement of melatonin, a hormone associated with day-night cycles in most vertebrates. In a recent study we found no effects of melatonin administration on Zugunruhe during spring migration. However, previous studies indicated that the response to melatonin manipulation could differ between spring and autumn migration, which are in fact separate life history stages. Here we tested whether a non-invasive treatment with melatonin can alter Zugunruhe in wild garden warblers S. borin and blackcaps S. atricapilla subject to temporary captivity at an autumnal stopover site. Food availability in the cage (yes/no) was added as a second factor because previous work showed that it enhanced Zugunruhe.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 55 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 48%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#372
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,506
of 307,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.