You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rethinking communication: integrating storytelling for increased stakeholder engagement in environmental evidence synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0116-4 |
Authors |
Anneli Sundin, Karolin Andersson, Robert Watt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 16% |
Sweden | 14 | 14% |
Canada | 11 | 11% |
United States | 8 | 8% |
Germany | 3 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 71 | 70% |
Scientists | 26 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 33 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Lecturer | 13 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 19% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 37 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 24 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 10 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 21% |
Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#525,908
of 25,401,784 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#9
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,137
of 344,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.