↓ Skip to main content

A Method for Setting the Size of Plant Conservation Target Areas

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Method for Setting the Size of Plant Conservation Target Areas
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003603.x
Authors

Mark A. Burgman, Hugh P. Possingham, A. Jasmyn J. Lynch, David A. Keith, Michael A. McCarthy, Stephen D. Hopper, Wendy L. Drury, Jason A. Passioura, Robert J. Devries

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 19 8%
South Africa 7 3%
Australia 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 186 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 88 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Master 27 11%
Other 27 11%
Professor 19 8%
Other 58 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 51%
Environmental Science 96 39%
Unspecified 13 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 4 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2010.
All research outputs
#3,549,033
of 12,348,877 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,502
of 2,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,626
of 266,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,348,877 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.