↓ Skip to main content

Impactos de adoecimento de longa duração: experiência de adultos jovens com Leucemia Mieloide Aguda

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impactos de adoecimento de longa duração: experiência de adultos jovens com Leucemia Mieloide Aguda
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018232.15442017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reni Aparecida Barsaglini, Beluci Bianca Nunes de Siqueira Soares

Abstract

This article analyzes the tangible and intangible impacts involved in the experience of young adults diagnosed with a long-term illness, namely Acute Myeloid Leukemia. It follows on from broader research, inspired by the Phenomenology of Alfred Schutz. The data were obtained through in-depth interviews with four young adults, aged between 20 and 28, who were in the maintenance phase of cancer treatment between November 2013 and January 2014 in the State of Mato Grosso. The results focus on striking aspects of the impacts of the experience during the process of becoming aware of the illness in which the diagnosis provoked feelings mobilized by ideas regarding a serious illness. This is followed by the impacts on appearance due to the treatment, especially hair loss and day-to-day coping strategies, as well as weight gain or loss. Finally, there is the marked impact of the imminence of death due to the lethality of the disease and the testimony of the occurrence in friends and family, but also for the survivors. The impacts are the effects and transformations in the lives of people and their relations and evoke (re)actions, however, they are diluted in the experience composing it, and not being homogeneous, its approach addresses the singularity encountered in contextualized biographies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 38%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Psychology 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#355
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,245
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.