↓ Skip to main content

Fatores associados à coinfecção por HIV em casos de sífilis adquirida notificados em um Centro de Referência de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis e Aids no município de São Paulo, 2014*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fatores associados à coinfecção por HIV em casos de sífilis adquirida notificados em um Centro de Referência de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis e Aids no município de São Paulo, 2014*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000100008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Gianna Luppi, Solange Eduardo Chabu Gomes, Roberto José Carvalho da Silva, Amanda Miyako Ueno, Anna Maria Kamimura dos Santos, Ângela Tayra, Renata Ferreira Takahashi

Abstract

to describe sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics and to identify factors associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection in cases of acquired syphilis reported in a Reference Center for Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) and AIDS. cross-sectional study with secondary data from a Reference Center for STD and AIDS in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil, in 2014; the Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). 648 cases of acquired syphilis were reported, and 98% were male; 88% were men who have sex with men (MSM) and 57% had HIV co-infection; male sex (PR=1.95; 95%CI 1.05;3.61) and MSM (PR=1.87; 95%CI 1.38;2.53) were factors independently associated with HIV co-infection. there was a high prevalence of HIV co-infection in the service analyzed, disproportionately affecting MSM who were notified with acquired syphilis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 25%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Professor 4 4%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 38 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#157
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,470
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.