↓ Skip to main content

Carbon dioxide in magmas and implications for hydrothermal systems

Overview of attention for article published in Mineralium Deposita, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon dioxide in magmas and implications for hydrothermal systems
Published in
Mineralium Deposita, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/s001260100185
Authors

Jacob Lowenstern

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 184 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 29%
Researcher 52 27%
Student > Master 23 12%
Unspecified 13 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 39 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 162 84%
Unspecified 17 9%
Chemistry 4 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Energy 2 1%
Other 7 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,501,060
of 12,227,808 outputs
Outputs from Mineralium Deposita
#10
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,262
of 270,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mineralium Deposita
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,227,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.