↓ Skip to main content

Early Detection of Preeclampsia Using Circulating Small non-coding RNA

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Detection of Preeclampsia Using Circulating Small non-coding RNA
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21604-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liron Yoffe, Avital Gilam, Orly Yaron, Avital Polsky, Luba Farberov, Argyro Syngelaki, Kypros Nicolaides, Moshe Hod, Noam Shomron

Abstract

Preeclampsia is one of the most dangerous pregnancy complications, and the leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Although the clinical symptoms appear late, its origin is early, and hence detection is feasible already at the first trimester. In the current study, we investigated the abundance of circulating small non-coding RNAs in the plasma of pregnant women in their first trimester, seeking transcripts that best separate the preeclampsia samples from those of healthy pregnant women. To this end, we performed small non-coding RNAs sequencing of 75 preeclampsia and control samples, and identified 25 transcripts that were differentially expressed between preeclampsia and the control groups. Furthermore, we utilized those transcripts and created a pipeline for a supervised classification of preeclampsia. Our pipeline generates a logistic regression model using a 5-fold cross validation on numerous random partitions into training and blind test sets. Using this classification procedure, we achieved an average AUC value of 0.86. These findings suggest the predictive value of circulating small non-coding RNA in the first trimester, warranting further examination, and lay the foundation for producing a novel early non-invasive diagnostic tool for preeclampsia, which could reduce the life-threatening risk for both the mother and fetus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Lecturer 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 41 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#405,721
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,490
of 136,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,495
of 336,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#147
of 4,270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.