↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Virus Research

Overview of attention for book
Advances in Virus Research
Elsevier
Attention for Chapter: Hosts and Sources of Endemic Human Coronaviruses
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 340)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hosts and Sources of Endemic Human Coronaviruses
Book title
Advances in Virus Research
Published in
Advances in Virus Research, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.01.001
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-815201-0
Authors

Victor M. Corman, Doreen Muth, Daniela Niemeyer, Christian Drosten, Corman VM, Muth D, Niemeyer D, Drosten C

Abstract

The four endemic human coronaviruses HCoV-229E, -NL63, -OC43, and -HKU1 contribute a considerable share of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in adults and children. While their clinical representation resembles that of many other agents of the common cold, their evolutionary histories, and host associations could provide important insights into the natural history of past human pandemics. For two of these viruses, we have strong evidence suggesting an origin in major livestock species while primordial associations for all four viruses may have existed with bats and rodents. HCoV-NL63 and -229E may originate from bat reservoirs as assumed for many other coronaviruses, but HCoV-OC43 and -HKU1 seem more likely to have speciated from rodent-associated viruses. HCoV-OC43 is thought to have emerged from ancestors in domestic animals such as cattle or swine. The bovine coronavirus has been suggested to be a possible ancestor, from which HCoV-OC43 may have emerged in the context of a pandemic recorded historically at the end of the 19th century. New data suggest that HCoV-229E may actually be transferred from dromedary camels similar to Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus. This scenario provides important ecological parallels to the present prepandemic pattern of host associations of the MERS coronavirus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 224 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1243 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 178 14%
Student > Master 150 12%
Researcher 133 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 4%
Other 176 14%
Unknown 445 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 189 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 129 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 78 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 3%
Other 215 17%
Unknown 502 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 341. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#98,179
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Virus Research
#2
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,313
of 452,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Virus Research
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.