↓ Skip to main content

Having a higher blast percentage in circulation than bone marrow: clinical implications in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias

Overview of attention for article published in Leukemia, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
20 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Having a higher blast percentage in circulation than bone marrow: clinical implications in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute lymphoid and myeloid leukemias
Published in
Leukemia, July 2005
DOI 10.1038/sj.leu.2403876
Pubmed ID
Authors

H M Amin, Y Yang, Y Shen, E H Estey, F J Giles, S A Pierce, H M Kantarjian, S M O'Brien, I Jilani, M Albitar

Abstract

Determining the percentage of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) blasts is important for diagnosing and classifying acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Although most patients with acute leukemia or MDS have a higher percentage of BM blasts than PB blasts, the relative proportion is reversed in some patients. We explored the clinical relevance of this phenomenon in MDS (n = 446), AML (n = 1314), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 385). Among patients with MDS or ALL, but not AML, having a higher blast percentage in PB than in BM was associated with significantly shorter survival. In multivariate analyses, these associations were independent of other relevant predictors, including cytogenetic status. Our findings suggest that MDS and ALL patients who have a higher percentage of PB blasts than BM blasts have more aggressive disease. These data also suggest that MDS classification schemes should take into account the percentage of blasts in PB differently from the percentage of blasts in BM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Engineering 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,342,357
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia
#550
of 5,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,811
of 58,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.