You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Moral distress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nursing Ethics, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0969733014557139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan McCarthy, Chris Gastmans |
| Abstract |
The aim of this review is to examine the ways in which the concept of moral distress has been delineated and deployed in the argument-based nursing ethics literature. It adds to what we already know about moral distress from reviews of the qualitative and quantitative research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 17% |
| Psychology | 22 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,662,605
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Ethics
#313
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,465
of 365,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Ethics
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.