↓ Skip to main content

Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001898.pub2

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Unknown 135 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 59 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 61 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2008.
All research outputs
#3,453,662
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,957
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,250
of 273,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.