↓ Skip to main content

Convergence of marine megafauna movement patterns in coastal and open oceans

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
322 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Convergence of marine megafauna movement patterns in coastal and open oceans
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716137115
Pubmed ID
Authors

A M M Sequeira, J P Rodríguez, V M Eguíluz, R Harcourt, M Hindell, D W Sims, C M Duarte, D P Costa, J Fernández-Gracia, L C Ferreira, G C Hays, M R Heupel, M G Meekan, A Aven, F Bailleul, A M M Baylis, M L Berumen, C D Braun, J Burns, M J Caley, R Campbell, R H Carmichael, E Clua, L D Einoder, Ari Friedlaender, M E Goebel, S D Goldsworthy, C Guinet, J Gunn, D Hamer, N Hammerschlag, M Hammill, L A Hückstädt, N E Humphries, M-A Lea, A Lowther, A Mackay, E McHuron, J McKenzie, L McLeay, C R McMahon, K Mengersen, M M C Muelbert, A M Pagano, B Page, N Queiroz, P W Robinson, S A Shaffer, M Shivji, G B Skomal, S R Thorrold, S Villegas-Amtmann, M Weise, R Wells, B Wetherbee, A Wiebkin, B Wienecke, M Thums

Abstract

The extent of increasing anthropogenic impacts on large marine vertebrates partly depends on the animals' movement patterns. Effective conservation requires identification of the key drivers of movement including intrinsic properties and extrinsic constraints associated with the dynamic nature of the environments the animals inhabit. However, the relative importance of intrinsic versus extrinsic factors remains elusive. We analyze a global dataset of ∼2.8 million locations from >2,600 tracked individuals across 50 marine vertebrates evolutionarily separated by millions of years and using different locomotion modes (fly, swim, walk/paddle). Strikingly, movement patterns show a remarkable convergence, being strongly conserved across species and independent of body length and mass, despite these traits ranging over 10 orders of magnitude among the species studied. This represents a fundamental difference between marine and terrestrial vertebrates not previously identified, likely linked to the reduced costs of locomotion in water. Movement patterns were primarily explained by the interaction between species-specific traits and the habitat(s) they move through, resulting in complex movement patterns when moving close to coasts compared with more predictable patterns when moving in open oceans. This distinct difference may be associated with greater complexity within coastal microhabitats, highlighting a critical role of preferred habitat in shaping marine vertebrate global movements. Efforts to develop understanding of the characteristics of vertebrate movement should consider the habitat(s) through which they move to identify how movement patterns will alter with forecasted severe ocean changes, such as reduced Arctic sea ice cover, sea level rise, and declining oxygen content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 322 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 401 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 19%
Student > Master 65 16%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Other 18 4%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 88 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 40%
Environmental Science 92 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 3 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 109 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 316. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#109,295
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2,356
of 103,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,666
of 344,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#47
of 1,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.