↓ Skip to main content

The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema – the 2017 revision and update

Overview of attention for article published in World Allergy Organization Journal, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 871)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema – the 2017 revision and update
Published in
World Allergy Organization Journal, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40413-017-0180-1
Authors

Marcus Maurer, Markus Magerl, Ignacio Ansotegui, Emel Aygören-Pürsün, Stephen Betschel, Konrad Bork, Tom Bowen, Henrik Balle Boysen, Henriette Farkas, Anete S. Grumach, Michihiro Hide, Constance Katelaris, Richard Lockey, Hilary Longhurst, William R. Lumry, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Dumitru Moldovan, Alexander Nast, Ruby Pawankar, Paul Potter, Marc Riedl, Bruce Ritchie, Lanny Rosenwasser, Mario Sánchez-Borges, Yuxiang Zhi, Bruce Zuraw, Timothy Craig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 51 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,357,906
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#49
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,182
of 454,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.