You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of Burkholderia pseudomallei Identification Using the API 20NE System and a Latex Agglutination Test▿
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1128/jcm.00935-07 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Premjit Amornchai, Wirongrong Chierakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Yuvadee Mahakhunkijcharoen, Rattanaphone Phetsouvanh, Bart J. Currie, Paul N. Newton, Nguyen van Vinh Chau, Surasakdi Wongratanacheewin, Nicholas P. J. Day, Sharon J. Peacock |
| Abstract |
In an evaluation of the API 20NE for the identification of Burkholderia spp., 792/800 (99%) Burkholderia pseudomallei and 17/19 (89%) B. cepacia isolates were correctly identified but 10 B. mallei and 98 B. thailandensis isolates were not correctly identified. A latex agglutination test was positive for 796/800 (99.5%) B. pseudomallei isolates and negative for 120 other oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#6,350
of 14,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,783
of 82,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#23
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.