↓ Skip to main content

Qualidade dos registros de violência sexual contra a mulher no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan) em Santa Catarina, 2008-2013*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualidade dos registros de violência sexual contra a mulher no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan) em Santa Catarina, 2008-2013*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, March 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000100003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmem Regina Delziovo, Carolina Carvalho Bolsoni, Sheila Rubia Lindner, Elza Berger Salema Coelho

Abstract

to describe the quality of records on cases of sexual violence against women, reported in the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan), in Santa Catarina State, Brazil, from 2008 to 2013. normative assessment with data from records of sexual violence cases against women (≥10 years old); data quality was described according to the dimensions 'non-duplicity' (acceptable when >95%), 'completeness' (good when >75%), and 'consistency' (excellent when >90.0%) of information. 2,010 cases of sexual violence against women were studied, after the exclusion of four duplicate records; the percentage of non-duplicity was 99.9% (acceptable); of completeness was 93.3% (good) and of consistency was 98.9% (excellent). the results presented point out the usefulness of Sinan as a source of information for the surveillance of sexual violence against women and for planning actions to tackle this type of aggression.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 26 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Social Sciences 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Psychology 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 27 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#11,940,800
of 15,650,802 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#104
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,112
of 277,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,650,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.