You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Loss-of-function nuclear factor κB subunit 1 (NFKB1) variants are the most common monogenic cause of common variable immunodeficiency in Europeans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Tuijnenburg, Hana Lango Allen, Siobhan O. Burns, Daniel Greene, Machiel H. Jansen, Emily Staples, Jonathan Stephens, Keren J. Carss, Daniele Biasci, Helen Baxendale, Moira Thomas, Anita Chandra, Sorena Kiani-Alikhan, Hilary J. Longhurst, Suranjith L. Seneviratne, Eric Oksenhendler, Ilenia Simeoni, Godelieve J. de Bree, Anton T.J. Tool, Ester M.M. van Leeuwen, Eduard H.T.M. Ebberink, Alexander B. Meijer, Salih Tuna, Deborah Whitehorn, Matthew Brown, Ernest Turro, Adrian J. Thrasher, Kenneth G.C. Smith, James E. Thaventhiran, Taco W. Kuijpers, Zoe Adhya, Hana Alachkar, Ariharan Anantharachagan, Richard Antrobus, Gururaj Arumugakani, Chiara Bacchelli, Helen Baxendale, Claire Bethune, Shahnaz Bibi, Barbara Boardman, Claire Booth, Michael Browning, Mary Brownlie, Siobhan Burns, Anita Chandra, Hayley Clifford, Nichola Cooper, Sophie Davies, John Dempster, Lisa Devlin, Rainer Doffinger, Elizabeth Drewe, David Edgar, William Egner, Tariq El-Shanawany, Bobby Gaspar, Rohit Ghurye, Kimberley Gilmour, Sarah Goddard, Pavel Gordins, Sofia Grigoriadou, Scott Hackett, Rosie Hague, Lorraine Harper, Grant Hayman, Archana Herwadkar, Stephen Hughes, Aarnoud Huissoon, Stephen Jolles, Julie Jones, Peter Kelleher, Nigel Klein, Taco Kuijpers, Dinakantha Kumararatne, James Laffan, Hana Lango Allen, Sara Lear, Hilary Longhurst, Lorena Lorenzo, Jesmeen Maimaris, Ania Manson, Elizabeth McDermott, Hazel Millar, Anoop Mistry, Valerie Morrisson, Sai Murng, Iman Nasir, Sergey Nejentsev, Sadia Noorani, Eric Oksenhendler, Mark Ponsford, Waseem Qasim, Ellen Quinn, Isabella Quinti, Alex Richter, Crina Samarghitean, Ravishankar Sargur, Sinisa Savic, Suranjith Seneviratne, Carrock Sewall, Fiona Shackley, Ilenia Simeoni, Kenneth G.C. Smith, Emily Staples, Hans Stauss, Cathal Steele, James Thaventhiran, Moira Thomas, Adrian Thrasher, Steve Welch, Lisa Willcocks, Sarita Workman, Austen Worth, Nigel Yeatman, Patrick Yong, Sofie Ashford, John Bradley, Debra Fletcher, Tracey Hammerton, Roger James, Nathalie Kingston, Willem Ouwehand, Christopher Penkett, F Lucy Raymond, Kathleen Stirrups, Marijke Veltman, Tim Young, Sofie Ashford, Matthew Brown, Naomi Clements-Brod, John Davis, Eleanor Dewhurst, Marie Erwood, Amy Frary, Rachel Linger, Jennifer Martin, Sofia Papadia, Karola Rehnstrom, William Astle, Antony Attwood, Marta Bleda, Keren Carss, Louise Daugherty, Sri Deevi, Stefan Graf, Daniel Greene, Csaba Halmagyi, Matthias Haimel, Fengyuan Hu, Roger James, Hana Lango Allen, Vera Matser, Stuart Meacham, Karyn Megy, Christopher Penkett, Olga Shamardina, Kathleen Stirrups, Catherine Titterton, Salih Tuna, Ernest Turro, Ping Yu, Julie von Ziegenweldt, Abigail Furnell, Rutendo Mapeta, Ilenia Simeoni, Simon Staines, Jonathan Stephens, Kathleen Stirrups, Deborah Whitehorn, Paula Rayner-Matthews, Christopher Watt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 42 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,988,646
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#8,770
of 11,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,598
of 349,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#136
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.