↓ Skip to main content

Flame Ionization Detector for Gas Chromatography

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 1958
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Flame Ionization Detector for Gas Chromatography
Published in
Nature, March 1958
DOI 10.1038/181760a0
Authors

I. G. McWILLIAM, R. A. DEWAR

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,427,068
of 13,243,534 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#46,386
of 68,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,968
of 275,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#849
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,243,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.