↓ Skip to main content

The scyphomedusan fauna of the Japan Trench: preliminary results from a remotely-operated vehicle

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The scyphomedusan fauna of the Japan Trench: preliminary results from a remotely-operated vehicle
Published in
Hydrobiologia, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10750-004-2645-9
Authors

Dhugal J. Lindsay, Yasuo Furushima, Hiroshi Miyake, Minoru Kitamura, James C. Hunt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 64%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,002
of 75,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.