↓ Skip to main content

When Should Screening and Surveillance Be Used during Pregnancy?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Should Screening and Surveillance Be Used during Pregnancy?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.msoc1-1803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy D Campbell

Abstract

Using the ethical and legal concept of shared responsibility for healthy births, this article considers social, cultural, and historical contexts in which medicalization and criminalization have worked in tandem to widen surveillance in ways that intensify scrutiny of women's lives under the guise of child protection, bringing women who are pregnant, postpartum, or parenting under criminal justice control. Although pregnant and postpartum women are prime candidates for medication-assisted treatment (MAT), the expanding carceral system has not prioritized drug treatment or reproductive justice. This article investigates ethical and historical dimensions of the question, According to which principles and practices should screening and surveillance be carried out to reduce harm, safeguard civil and human rights-including reproductive autonomy-and ensure that treatment, when necessary, occurs in the least coercive settings possible?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 18 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 20 51%