↓ Skip to main content

ASC- and caspase-8-dependent apoptotic pathway diverges from the NLRC4 inflammasome in macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ASC- and caspase-8-dependent apoptotic pathway diverges from the NLRC4 inflammasome in macrophages
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21998-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina L. Lee, Kathleen M. Mirrashidi, Irma B. Stowe, Sarah K. Kummerfeld, Colin Watanabe, Benjamin Haley, Trinna L. Cuellar, Michael Reichelt, Nobuhiko Kayagaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 24 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,480,508
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#51,119
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,490
of 348,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,553
of 4,015 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,015 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.