↓ Skip to main content

Yoga for prenatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Yoga for prenatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12888-015-0393-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Gong, Chenxu Ni, Xiaoliang Shen, Tengyun Wu, Chunlei Jiang

Abstract

BackgroundPrenatal depression can negatively affect the physical and mental health of both mother and fetus. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of yoga as an intervention in the management of prenatal depression.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO from all retrieved articles describing such trials up to July 2014.ResultsSix RCTs were identified in the systematic search. The sample consisted of 375 pregnant women, most of whom were between 20 and 40 years of age. The diagnoses of depression were determined by their scores on Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. When compared with comparison groups (e.g., standard prenatal care, standard antenatal exercises, social support, etc.), the level of depression statistically significantly reduced in yoga groups (standardized mean difference [SMD], ¿0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], ¿0.94 to ¿0.25; p¿=¿0.0007). One subgroup analysis revealed that both the levels of depressive symptoms in prenatally depressed women (SMD, ¿0.46; CI, ¿0.90 to ¿0.03; p¿=¿0.04) and non-depressed women (SMD, ¿0.87; CI, ¿1.22 to ¿0.52; p¿<¿0.00001) were statistically significantly lower in yoga group than that in control group. There were two kinds of yoga: the physical-exercise-based yoga and integrated yoga, which, besides physical exercises, included pranayama, meditation or deep relaxation. Therefore, the other subgroup analysis was conducted to estimate effects of the two kinds of yoga on prenatal depression. The results showed that the level of depression was significantly decreased in the integrated yoga group (SMD, ¿0.79; CI, ¿1.07 to ¿0.51; p¿<¿0.00001) but not significantly reduced in physical-exercise-based yoga group (SMD, ¿0.41; CI, ¿1.01 to ¿0.18; p¿=¿0.17).ConclusionsPrenatal yoga intervention in pregnant women may be effective in partly reducing depressive symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 564 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 15%
Student > Master 80 14%
Researcher 41 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 109 19%
Unknown 187 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 106 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 17%
Psychology 66 12%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Sports and Recreations 21 4%
Other 71 12%
Unknown 188 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#336,903
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#85
of 5,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,078
of 360,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#4
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.