↓ Skip to main content

Promoting men’s knowledge of cancer risk reduction: A systematic review of interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Promoting men’s knowledge of cancer risk reduction: A systematic review of interventions
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Reidy, Mohamad M. Saab, Josephine Hegarty, Christian Von Wagner, Mairin O’Mahony, Mike Murphy, Frances J. Drummond

Abstract

To critically appraise and discuss evidence from interventions designed to increase men's knowledge about cancer risk reduction. A systematic review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched for interventions published between January 1st 2006 and May 30th 2016 in English. Studies were included if they used an experimental design, included adult males (≥18 years), and had a primary focus on the acquisition and utilisation of information on cancer risk reduction. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised. A total of 25 studies met the inclusion criteria, 23 of which involved prostate cancer risk reduction. Twenty-one studies reported knowledge gain among the men. Three studies found that knowledge gain was associated with health literacy. Interventions aiming to improve men's knowledge about cancer risk reduction require a multimodal approach. Findings highlight the need to design and measure the impact of interventions for men on wider cancer risk reduction topics, while accounting for different socio-demographic and ethnic groups, literacy and health literacy levels. More research is warranted into the development and evaluation of theoretically-driven multimodal community-based approaches to information dissemination for men taking into account their daily information spheres such as workplaces and community environs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Psychology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,459,420
of 24,835,287 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#390
of 4,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,854
of 336,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#8
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,835,287 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.