You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review of Recent Advances in Research on PM2.5 in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3390/ijerph15030438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaolin Lin, Jiale Zou, Wei Yang, Chun-Qing Li |
| Abstract |
PM2.5pollution has become a severe problem in China due to rapid industrialization and high energy consumption. It can cause increases in the incidence of various respiratory diseases and resident mortality rates, as well as increase in the energy consumption in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems due to the need for air purification. This paper reviews and studies the sources of indoor and outdoor PM2.5, the impact of PM2.5pollution on atmospheric visibility, occupational health, and occupants' behaviors. This paper also presents current pollution status in China, the relationship between indoor and outdoor PM2.5, and control of indoor PM2.5, and finally presents analysis and suggestions for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Curaçao | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 252 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 18% |
| Engineering | 35 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 96 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#720,728
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#1,263
of 31,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,536
of 346,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#13
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.