↓ Skip to main content

Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
240 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor1-1803
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Crisis pregnancy centers are organizations that seek to intercept women with unintended pregnancies who might be considering abortion. Their mission is to prevent abortions by persuading women that adoption or parenting is a better option. They strive to give the impression that they are clinical centers, offering legitimate medical services and advice, yet they are exempt from regulatory, licensure, and credentialing oversight that apply to health care facilities. Because the religious ideology of these centers' owners and employees takes priority over the health and well-being of the women seeking care at these centers, women do not receive comprehensive, accurate, evidence-based clinical information about all available options. Although crisis pregnancy centers enjoy First Amendment rights protections, their propagation of misinformation should be regarded as an ethical violation that undermines women's health.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 30%