↓ Skip to main content

Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
83 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor1-1803
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Crisis pregnancy centers are organizations that seek to intercept women with unintended pregnancies who might be considering abortion. Their mission is to prevent abortions by persuading women that adoption or parenting is a better option. They strive to give the impression that they are clinical centers, offering legitimate medical services and advice, yet they are exempt from regulatory, licensure, and credentialing oversight that apply to health care facilities. Because the religious ideology of these centers' owners and employees takes priority over the health and well-being of the women seeking care at these centers, women do not receive comprehensive, accurate, evidence-based clinical information about all available options. Although crisis pregnancy centers enjoy First Amendment rights protections, their propagation of misinformation should be regarded as an ethical violation that undermines women's health.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 38%
Unspecified 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 1 8%