↓ Skip to main content

Use of Bepridil in Combination With Ic Antiarrhythmic Agent in Converting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Bepridil in Combination With Ic Antiarrhythmic Agent in Converting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm
Published in
Circulation Journal, January 2008
DOI 10.1253/circj.72.709
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinobu Imai, Fumio Saito, Hidehito Takase, Mitsunobu Enomoto, Hiroshi Aoyama, Satoshi Yamaji, Katsuaki Yokoyama, Hiroshi Yagi, Toshio Kushiro, Atsushi Hirayama

Abstract

It has been reported that bepridil is as good as amiodarone in converting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm (SR). The conversion effect of bepridil alone is not always satisfactory, however. The efficacy of pharmacological cardioversion by the combination of bepridil and a class Ic antiarrhythmic drug for persistent AF is studied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 16%
Chemistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,697,449
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#429
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,469
of 158,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#14
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.