↓ Skip to main content

Optimized high gradient magnetic separation for isolation of Plasmodium-infected red blood cells

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimized high gradient magnetic separation for isolation of Plasmodium-infected red blood cells
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian C Bhakdi, Annette Ottinger, Sangdao Somsri, Panudda Sratongno, Peeranad Pannadaporn, Pattamawan Chimma, Prida Malasit, Kovit Pattanapanyasat, Hartmut PH Neumann

Abstract

Highly purified infected red blood cells (irbc), or highly synchronized parasite cultures, are regularly required in malaria research. Conventional isolation and synchronization rely on density and osmotic fragility of irbc, respectively. High gradient magnetic separation (HGMS) offers an alternative based on intrinsic magnetic properties of irbc, avoiding exposure to chemicals and osmotic stress. Successful HGMS concentration in malaria research was previously reported using polymer coated columns, while HGMS depletion has not been described yet. This study presents a new approach to both HGMS concentration and depletion in malaria research, rendering polymer coating unnecessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 4%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 31%
Engineering 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,513,236
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,143
of 5,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,618
of 165,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.