You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie L. Boughton, Maria K. Kowalczuk, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Elizabeth Wager, Elizabeth C. Moylan |
| Abstract |
In May 2016, we launched Research Integrity and Peer Review, an international, open access journal with fully open peer review (reviewers are identified on their reports and named reports are published alongside the article) to provide a home for research on research and publication ethics, research reporting, and research on peer review. As the journal enters its third year, we reflect on recent events and highlights for the journal and explore how the journal is faring in terms of gender and diversity in peer review. We also share the particular interests of our Editors-in-Chief regarding models of peer review, reporting quality, common research integrity issues that arise during the publishing process, and how people interact with the published literature. We continue to encourage further research into peer review, research and publication ethics and research reporting, as we believe that all new initiatives should be evidence-based. We also remain open to constructive discussions of the developments in the field that offer new solutions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 33% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 58% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 23% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,076,576
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#52
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,062
of 347,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.