↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of safety tool for ambulatory leprosy patients at risk of adverse outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of safety tool for ambulatory leprosy patients at risk of adverse outcome
Published in
Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40794-018-0061-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara MacRae, Swana Kopalakrishnan, Lena Faust, Michael Klowak, Adrienne Showler, Stefanie A. Klowak, Andrea K. Boggild

Abstract

Leprosy is a potentially debilitating disease of the skin and nerves that requires a complex management approach consisting of laboratory monitoring, screening for factors that will adversely affect outcome with corticosteroids, engagement of allied health services, and prolonged follow-up. Given the complexities of leprosy management, a safety tool was developed and implemented in the Tropical Disease Unit at Toronto General Hospital. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of the tool using a retrospective chart review. We reviewed the charts of patients with leprosy treated over a 3.5-year period: up to 3 years prior to tool implementation, and 6-months following implementation. Pre-determined outcomes of interest included: loss to follow-up; monitoring of laboratory parameters; allied health services engagement; baseline ophthalmologic assessment; and risk mitigation interventions. Of 17 patients enrolled, 8 were treated pre-implementation, and 9 post-implementation. Five (29.4%) pre-implementation patients were lost to follow-up compared to none post-implementation (p = 0.009). One (12.5%) pre-implementation patient was sent for baseline ophthalmologic assessment versus 8 (88.9%) post-implementation (p = 0.0034). Only post-implementation patients received referrals for occupational therapy and social work, with 77.8% (n = 7) receiving occupational therapy (p = 0.0023) and 33.3% (n = 3) social work (p = 0.2059). Laboratory parameters such as hemoglobin, hepatic transaminases, and methemoglobin were routinely monitored for patients on dapsone irrespective of tool implementation. Implementation of a leprosy-specific safety tool has established a user-friendly method for systemizing all elements of care, and ensuring the involvement of allied health services necessary for optimizing health outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,407,641
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#27
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,863
of 346,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.