↓ Skip to main content

Who Counts? What Counts? Place and the Limits of Perinatal Mortality Measures

Overview of attention for article published in AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Who Counts? What Counts? Place and the Limits of Perinatal Mortality Measures
Published in
AMA Journal of Ethics, March 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor2-1803
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Maternal and neonatal mortality statistics foreground some possible causes of death at the expense of others. Political place (nation, state) and place of birth (hospital, home) are integral to these statistics; respect for women as persons is not. Using case examples from Malawi and the United States, I argue that the focus on place embedded in these indicators can legitimate coercive approaches to childbirth. Qualitative assessments in both cases reveal that respectful care, while not represented in current indicators, is critical for the health of women and newborns. Perinatal outcomes measures thus must be rethought to ensure ethical and safe maternity care. This rethinking will require new questions and new methods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Social Sciences 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%