↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing elk recruitment across ecotypes in the Western United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing elk recruitment across ecotypes in the Western United States
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21438
Authors

Paul M. Lukacs, Michael S. Mitchell, Mark Hebblewhite, Bruce K. Johnson, Heather Johnson, Matthew Kauffman, Kelly M. Proffitt, Peter Zager, Jedediah Brodie, Kent Hersey, A. Andrew Holland, Mark Hurley, Scott McCorquodale, Arthur Middleton, Matthew Nordhagen, J. Joshua Nowak, Daniel P. Walsh, P. J. White

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 43%
Environmental Science 20 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 25 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#10,462,262
of 17,800,904 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,454
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,231
of 286,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,800,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.