↓ Skip to main content

Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Unbeck, Synnöve Lindemalm, Per Nydert, Britt-Marie Ygge, Urban Nylén, Carina Berglund, Karin Pukk Härenstam

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about adverse events (AEs) in pediatric patients. Record review is a common methodology for identifying AEs, but in pediatrics the record review tools generally have limited focus. The aim of the present study was to develop a broadly applicable record review tool to identify AEs in pediatric inpatients.MethodsUsing a broad literature review and expert opinion with a modified Delphi process, a pediatric trigger tool with 88 triggers, definitions, and descriptions including AE preventability decision support was developed and tested in a random sample of 600 hospitalized pediatric patients admitted in 2010 to a single university children¿s hospital. Four registered nurse-physician teams performed complete two-stage retrospective reviews of 150 records each from either neonatal, surgical/orthopedic, medicine, or emergency medicine units.ResultsRegistered nurse review identified 296 of 600 records with triggers indicating potential AEs. Records (n¿=¿121) with only false positive triggers not indicating any potential AEs were not forwarded to the next review stage. On subsequent physician review, 204 (34.0%) of patients were found to have had 563 AEs, range 1¿27 AEs/patient. A total of 442 preventable AEs were found in 161 patients (26.8%), range 1¿22. Overall, triggers were found 3,598 times in 417 (69.5%) records, with a mean of 6 (median 1, range 0¿176) triggers per patient. The overall positive predictive value of the triggers was 22.9%, (range 0.0-100.0%). The final pediatric trigger tool, developed with a second Delphi round, required 29 triggers.ConclusionsAEs are common in pediatric patients and most are preventable. The main contributions of this study are to further develop and adapt trigger definitions, including AE preventability decision support, to introduce new triggers in pediatric care, as well as to apply pediatric triggers in different clinical specialties. Our findings resulted in a national pediatric trigger tool, and might also be adapted internationally. The pediatric trigger tool can help healthcare organizations to measure and analyze the AEs occurring in hospitalized children in order to improve patient safety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 39 30%