↓ Skip to main content

A LATS biosensor screen identifies VEGFR as a regulator of the Hippo pathway in angiogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A LATS biosensor screen identifies VEGFR as a regulator of the Hippo pathway in angiogenesis
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03278-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Azad, H. J. Janse van Rensburg, E. D. Lightbody, B. Neveu, A. Champagne, A. Ghaffari, V. R. Kay, Y. Hao, H. Shen, B. Yeung, B. A. Croy, K. L. Guan, F. Pouliot, J. Zhang, C. J. B. Nicol, X. Yang

Abstract

The Hippo pathway is a central regulator of tissue development and homeostasis, and has been reported to have a role during vascular development. Here we develop a bioluminescence-based biosensor that monitors the activity of the Hippo core component LATS kinase. Using this biosensor and a library of small molecule kinase inhibitors, we perform a screen for kinases modulating LATS activity and identify VEGFR as an upstream regulator of the Hippo pathway. We find that VEGFR activation by VEGF triggers PI3K/MAPK signaling, which subsequently inhibits LATS and activates the Hippo effectors YAP and TAZ. We further show that the Hippo pathway is a critical mediator of VEGF-induced angiogenesis and tumor vasculogenic mimicry. Thus, our work offers a biosensor tool for the study of the Hippo pathway and suggests a role for Hippo signaling in regulating blood vessel formation in physiological and pathological settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,652,750
of 23,393,513 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,839
of 48,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,416
of 334,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#601
of 1,229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.