↓ Skip to main content

Cytomegalovirus-induced immunopathology and its clinical consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Herpesviridae, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytomegalovirus-induced immunopathology and its clinical consequences
Published in
Herpesviridae, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/2042-4280-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefania Varani, Maria Paola Landini

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous DNA virus that causes severe disease in patients with immature or impaired immune systems. During active infection, CMV modulates host immunity, and CMV-infected patients often develop signs of immune dysfunction, such as immunosuppression and autoimmune phenomena. Furthermore, active viral infection has been observed in several autoimmune diseases, and case reports have linked primary CMV infection and the onset of autoimmune disorders. In addition, CMV infection promotes allograft rejection and graft-versus-host disease in solid organ and bone marrow transplant recipients, respectively, further implicating CMV in the genesis and maintenance of immunopathological phenomena. The mechanisms by which CMV could induce inhibition of host defense, inflammation, and autoimmunity are discussed, as is the treatment of virus-induced immunopathology with antivirals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,196,101
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Herpesviridae
#6
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,011
of 120,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Herpesviridae
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them