↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12961-018-0296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Manafo, Lisa Petermann, Ping Mason-Lai, Virginia Vandall-Walker

Abstract

It has been highlighted that the original manuscript [1] contains a typesetting error in the surname of Virginia Vandall-Walker. This was incorrectly captured as Virgnia Vandall-Walker in the original manuscript which has since been updated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,140,900
of 12,651,470 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#577
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,932
of 274,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,651,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them