You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for ADDITION-PRO: a longitudinal cohort study of the cardiovascular experience of individuals at high risk for diabetes recruited from Danish primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nanna B Johansen, Anne-Louise S Hansen, Troels M Jensen, Annelotte Philipsen, Signe S Rasmussen, Marit E Jørgensen, Rebecca K Simmons, Torsten Lauritzen, Annelli Sandbæk, Daniel R Witte |
| Abstract |
Screening programmes for type 2 diabetes inevitably find more individuals at high risk for diabetes than people with undiagnosed prevalent disease. While well established guidelines for the treatment of diabetes exist, less is known about treatment or prevention strategies for individuals found at high risk following screening. In order to make better use of the opportunities for primary prevention of diabetes and its complications among this high risk group, it is important to quantify diabetes progression rates and to examine the development of early markers of cardiovascular disease and microvascular diabetic complications. We also require a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie and drive early changes in cardiometabolic physiology. The ADDITION-PRO study was designed to address these issues among individuals at different levels of diabetes risk recruited from Danish primary care. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,459,660
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,844
of 14,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,338
of 279,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.