You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aar2307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Breda, Elyès Jouini, Clotilde Napp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 18% |
| France | 9 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 66% |
| Scientists | 27 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 21% |
| Psychology | 12 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#350,764
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,161
of 83,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,059
of 352,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#341
of 1,275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.