You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002125.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil Johnson, Sabine van Voorst, Martin C Sowter, Annika Strandell, Ben Willem J Mol |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,098,049
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,418
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,640
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.