Is argument about how policy was first implimented secondary to current evidence or still imp? http://t.co/UavknDFYiy
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Just heard Zoe Harcombe on R4 Today re Scientific evidence (or lack thereof) and dietary advice. Source: http://t.co/XIIc6ELWRQ
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
New fat review in press today. Ignoring well-known conflict of interest of author, what do people make of the review? http://t.co/v12T7IAP1G
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
New paper by @FergalGrace @UWSNick @zoeharcombe challenging dietary fat guidelines is likely to stimulate discussion! http://t.co/AuktbuozDx
.@ProfTimNoakes Seen this? http://t.co/pfblWN8FeF Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs #LCHF
http://t.co/Iwj6MkcsOO @zoeharcombe exposes the shortcomings of historical trials in new paper
【低脂肪食は総死亡,冠動脈疾患死を全く減少せず:RCT6報 [2467例] メタ解析】 OpenHeart http://t.co/GhgkHZue2v
Randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983 http://t.co/YyiiqqgcPB
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
No RCT had tested government dietary fat recommendations before their introduction. @zoeharcombe full paper http://t.co/ihkLrozGn6
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
No way!! MT @medskep: http://t.co/xz0FVjSJD1 Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence by @zoeharcombe
http://t.co/ihkLrozGn6 Brilliant article from @zoeharcombe - front page news everywhere
New fat review in press today. Ignoring well-known conflict of interest of author, what do people make of the review? http://t.co/v12T7IAP1G
http://t.co/ihkLrozGn6 Brilliant article from @zoeharcombe - front page news everywhere
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
What is not reported http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY only 2 of the studies had mortality as a primary outcome, hence need PICOS clearly reporting
(Open Heart) De cómo la GPC de 1983 se sacó las recondaciones dietéticas de la manga http://t.co/TMJ86Qh75U Rev Sist y MA CC @centinel5051
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Wir haben es geahnt: fettarm macht uns nicht gesünder! Und wie werden wir jetzt die Winterkilos los?http://t.co/NkWVHe6tV1
MT @RLystad: http://t.co/30faNovwyE Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs by @zoeharcombe
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
http://t.co/Iwj6MkcsOO @zoeharcombe exposes the shortcomings of historical trials in new paper
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983 http://t.co/N3guxhMiIt
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Meta-analysis concludes there was no RCT based evidence to establish dietary guidelines 30 y ago http://t.co/XCtjoqlvDT guess who r authors?
Historic consensus guidelines didn't have RCT evidence http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY it's like finding bear toilets near lots of trees, non-news
MT @RLystad: http://t.co/30faNovwyE Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs by @zoeharcombe
Have dietary fats been unfairly victimised? A review of RCTs does not find evidence to support current saturated... http://t.co/09yJxtU8Bf
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
“@Open_HeartBMJ Read our new study http://t.co/X1xPO8Dy8t and the editorial http://t.co/M1V2AGYMAR What do you think?” My editorial here.
What is not reported http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY only 2 of the studies had mortality as a primary outcome, hence need PICOS clearly reporting
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Dietary fat guidelines under fire. Could excess carbohydrates be part of the problem?? http://t.co/J1T0gVKyIU
Big Govt in action. When govt first advised a low fat, it lacked scientific evidence supporting it: http://t.co/TYQlBJlL7J @waldemaringdahl
The death of low-fat diets: "…that dietary advice not merely needs review; it should not have been introduced." http://t.co/77eceWHS8e
.@ProfTimNoakes Seen this? http://t.co/pfblWN8FeF Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs #LCHF
Historic consensus guidelines didn't have RCT evidence http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY it's like finding bear toilets near lots of trees, non-news
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
.@ProfTimNoakes Seen this? http://t.co/pfblWN8FeF Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs #LCHF
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983 http://t.co/N3guxhMiIt
Government recommendations to limit dietary fat were untested in any trial prior to being introduced http://t.co/Jsyw22ka9t
【低脂肪食は総死亡,冠動脈疾患死を全く減少せず:RCT6報 [2467例] メタ解析】 OpenHeart http://t.co/GhgkHZue2v
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Historic consensus guidelines didn't have RCT evidence http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY it's like finding bear toilets near lots of trees, non-news
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/gmq4SrnHVx
Meta-analysis concludes there was no RCT based evidence to establish dietary guidelines 30 y ago http://t.co/XCtjoqlvDT guess who r authors?
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/gmq4SrnHVx
"@RLystad: Dietary fat guidelines were introduced in US & UK in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs. #LCHF http://t.co/ff0YBjW4eg"
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
"@RLystad: Dietary fat guidelines were introduced in US & UK in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs. #LCHF http://t.co/ff0YBjW4eg"
.@ProfTimNoakes Seen this? http://t.co/pfblWN8FeF Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs #LCHF
.@ProfTimNoakes Seen this? http://t.co/pfblWN8FeF Dietary fat guidelines introduced in US & UK without supporting evidence from RCTs #LCHF
Historic consensus guidelines didn't have RCT evidence http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY it's like finding bear toilets near lots of trees, non-news
Meta-analysis concludes there was no RCT based evidence to establish dietary guidelines 30 y ago http://t.co/XCtjoqlvDT guess who r authors?
Is the PRISMA checklist available? http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY bias assessment methods unclear, says can be with paper? @zoeharcombe @jjdinicol
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
Big Govt in action. When govt first advised a low fat, it lacked scientific evidence supporting it: http://t.co/TYQlBJlL7J @waldemaringdahl
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
Big Govt in action. When govt first advised a low fat, it lacked scientific evidence supporting it: http://t.co/TYQlBJlL7J @waldemaringdahl
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
The death of low-fat diets: "…that dietary advice not merely needs review; it should not have been introduced." http://t.co/77eceWHS8e
The death of low-fat diets: "…that dietary advice not merely needs review; it should not have been introduced." http://t.co/77eceWHS8e
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
Meta-analysis on evidence of diet guidelines: http://t.co/ESfAaCa091 Filed under "No Shit". @zoeharcombe's blog: http://t.co/cR9z3uCJuL
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM