↓ Skip to main content

Non-compacted cardiomyopathy: clinical-echocardiographic study

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 120)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-compacted cardiomyopathy: clinical-echocardiographic study
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1476-7120-4-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilda Espinola-Zavaleta, M Elena Soto, Luis Muñóz Castellanos, Silvio Játiva-Chávez, Candace Keirns

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical and echocardiographic findings of ventricular noncompaction in adult patients. Fifty-three patients underwent complete clinical history, electrocardiogram, Holter and transthoracic echocardiogram. Forty patients (75%) were in class I/II of the New York Heart Association, and 13 (25%) in class III/IV. Ventricular and supraventricular escape beats were found in 40% and 26.4%, respectively. Holter showed premature ventricular contractions in 32% and sustained ventricular tachycardia in 7.5%. Ventricular noncompaction was an isolated finding in 74% of cases and was associated with other congenital heart disease in 26%. Noncompacted ventricular myocardium involved only left ventricle in 62% of the patients and both ventricles in 38%. The mean ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardial layers at the site of maximal wall thickness was 3.4 +/- 0.87 mm (range 2.2-7.5). The presence of ventricular noncompaction in more than three segments was associated with a functional class greater than II and ventricular arrhythmia with demonstrable statistical significance by chi2(p < 0.003).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Macedonia, Republic of 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Unspecified 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 71%
Unspecified 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2009.
All research outputs
#817,865
of 3,626,769 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#24
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,529
of 94,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,626,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.