↓ Skip to main content

Rejoinder to Dennis Gorman's critique of: “Preventing alcohol harm: Early results from a cluster randomised, controlled trial in Victoria, Australia of comprehensive harm minimisation school drug…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Drug Policy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rejoinder to Dennis Gorman's critique of: “Preventing alcohol harm: Early results from a cluster randomised, controlled trial in Victoria, Australia of comprehensive harm minimisation school drug education”
Published in
International Journal of Drug Policy, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.01.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Midford, David R. Foxcroft, Helen Cahill, Robyn Ramsden, Leanne Lester

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Psychology 4 24%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Mathematics 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,397,250
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Drug Policy
#2,580
of 2,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,919
of 264,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Drug Policy
#36
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.