↓ Skip to main content

Repeated landscape-scale treatments following fire suppress a non-native annual grass and promote recovery of native perennial vegetation

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeated landscape-scale treatments following fire suppress a non-native annual grass and promote recovery of native perennial vegetation
Published in
Biological Invasions, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10530-015-0847-x
Authors

Seth M. Munson, A. Lexine Long, Cheryl Decker, Katie A. Johnson, Kathleen Walsh, Mark E. Miller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 33%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 44%
Environmental Science 18 35%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,889,301
of 19,460,399 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#950
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,604
of 310,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,460,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.