↓ Skip to main content

Local control of polymicrobial infections via a dual antibiotic delivery system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local control of polymicrobial infections via a dual antibiotic delivery system
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13018-018-0760-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Tennent, Stefanie M. Shiels, Jessica A. Jennings, Warren O. Haggard, Joseph C. Wenke

Abstract

Contaminated traumatic open orthopedic wounds are frequently complicated by polymicrobial contamination and infection. In high-risk wounds, the standard of care comprises debridement and irrigation combined with antibiotics which can be applied directly or combined with systemic antibiotics. Recently, bioabsorbable chitosan sponges have been shown to be an effective single-agent delivery device for local antibiotics with and without negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Severely contaminated orthopedic wounds, however, are often complicated by polymicrobial infections, necessitating multiple antibiotic agents. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine if a chitosan sponge would provide a suitable delivery vehicle for multiple antibiotics for the treatment of a polymicrobial infection in a large animal polytraumatic extremity wound model. A complex polytraumatic extremity wound was created in 11 adult male Boer goats. Each wound was contaminated with a bioluminescent strain of S. aureus (1 ml of 108colony forming units/ml) and of P. aeruginosa (1 ml of 108 CFU/ml) which are genetically engineered to allow quantification with a photon-counting camera. Six hours following initial wound creation and contamination, wounds were debrided and irrigated with low-pressure normal saline. The animals were randomized into one of two treatments: wet-to-dry dressings alone or a commercially available chitosan sponge loaded with 1 g vancomycin and 1.2 g of tobramycin. Each animal was then recovered and reimaged 48 h later for total bacteria content; tissue samples were taken from the wound bed to determine relative bacterial colonization. All animals in the chitosan sponge group saw significant reductions in overall bacterial load of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (p = 0.001). The bioluminescence was also significantly reduced compared to the wet-to-dry dressing group (p = 0.0001). Furthermore, whereas the antibiotic sponge group displayed near complete eradication of bacteria, the wounds treated with the wet-to-dry dressings alone displayed a significant 2-log increase in total bacteria at 48 h p = 0.0001). S. aureus was the predominant species found in the wounds, comprising 95 and 99% of all bacteria found in the chitosan sponge and wet-to-dry, respectively. Dual antimicrobial therapy loaded in a chitosan sponge is an effective way to reduce polymicrobial infections traumatic extremity wound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,934,709
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#921
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,789
of 333,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.