↓ Skip to main content

The “Flashforward Procedure”: Confronting the Catastrophe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The “Flashforward Procedure”: Confronting the Catastrophe
Published in
Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1891/1933-3196.8.1.25
Authors

Robin David Julian Logie, Ad De Jongh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 86%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,970,459
of 4,741,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of EMDR Practice & Research
#59
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,550
of 169,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of EMDR Practice & Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,741,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.