↓ Skip to main content

Non-anthropogenic Diet-based Oiling of Predatory Birds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Raptor Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-anthropogenic Diet-based Oiling of Predatory Birds
Published in
Journal of Raptor Research, March 2018
DOI 10.3356/jrr-17-23.1
Authors

Todd E. Katzner, Daniel Driscoll, Ronald E. Jackman, Peter H. Bloom, Scott Thomas, Jeff L. Cooper, Stephen Living, Teryl G. Grubb, Jacqueline M. Doyle, Douglas A. Bell, Joseph E. Didonato, J. Andrew DeWoody

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#10,146,912
of 12,695,728 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Raptor Research
#292
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,818
of 274,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Raptor Research
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,695,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.