↓ Skip to main content

Patient reported outcome measures in practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient reported outcome measures in practice
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7818
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. C. Nelson, E. Eftimovska, C. Lind, A. Hager, J. H. Wasson, S. Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 398 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 18%
Researcher 71 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 15%
Other 37 9%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Other 84 21%
Unknown 44 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 13%
Psychology 21 5%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 73 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#322,936
of 14,260,037 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4,422
of 46,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,194
of 283,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#180
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,260,037 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.