↓ Skip to main content

Patient reported outcome measures in practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient reported outcome measures in practice
Published in
British Medical Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.g7818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene C Nelson, Elena Eftimovska, Cristin Lind, Andreas Hager, John H Wasson, Staffan Lindblad

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 484 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 17%
Researcher 79 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 15%
Other 45 9%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Other 110 22%
Unknown 57 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 217 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 14%
Psychology 26 5%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 2%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 91 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#394,456
of 16,530,961 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#5,296
of 50,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,427
of 294,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#175
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,530,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.