↓ Skip to main content

Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2070 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1717295115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eili Y Klein, Thomas P Van Boeckel, Elena M Martinez, Suraj Pant, Sumanth Gandra, Simon A Levin, Herman Goossens, Ramanan Laxminarayan

Abstract

Tracking antibiotic consumption patterns over time and across countries could inform policies to optimize antibiotic prescribing and minimize antibiotic resistance, such as setting and enforcing per capita consumption targets or aiding investments in alternatives to antibiotics. In this study, we analyzed the trends and drivers of antibiotic consumption from 2000 to 2015 in 76 countries and projected total global antibiotic consumption through 2030. Between 2000 and 2015, antibiotic consumption, expressed in defined daily doses (DDD), increased 65% (21.1-34.8 billion DDDs), and the antibiotic consumption rate increased 39% (11.3-15.7 DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day). The increase was driven by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where rising consumption was correlated with gross domestic product per capita (GDPPC) growth (P= 0.004). In high-income countries (HICs), although overall consumption increased modestly, DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day fell 4%, and there was no correlation with GDPPC. Of particular concern was the rapid increase in the use of last-resort compounds, both in HICs and LMICs, such as glycylcyclines, oxazolidinones, carbapenems, and polymyxins. Projections of global antibiotic consumption in 2030, assuming no policy changes, were up to 200% higher than the 42 billion DDDs estimated in 2015. Although antibiotic consumption rates in most LMICs remain lower than in HICs despite higher bacterial disease burden, consumption in LMICs is rapidly converging to rates similar to HICs. Reducing global consumption is critical for reducing the threat of antibiotic resistance, but reduction efforts must balance access limitations in LMICs and take account of local and global resistance patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 362 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 428 13%
Student > Bachelor 369 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 354 11%
Researcher 294 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 167 5%
Other 435 14%
Unknown 1158 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 326 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 277 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 223 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 169 5%
Environmental Science 146 5%
Other 749 23%
Unknown 1315 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1675. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,579
of 25,886,866 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#212
of 103,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114
of 347,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#9
of 1,036 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,886,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,036 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.